Alan Trick wrote:
XHTML 2 is going to get rid of the <img> tag, which I think is good. <object>
[...]
it's practically impossible to use it for anything useful as long as your clients are using IE.

Alan,

XHTML 2 is not meant to be backwards compatible. As IE doesn't officially support XHTML 2 at all (as, to my knowledge, no browser does natively), this discussion is irrelevant, IMHO. XHTML 2 should not be sent to anything other than user agents which (will eventually) support it.

Any similarities between XHTML 2 and XHTML 1.x are purely coincidental, if you will.

--
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to