RE: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf

[Edward Clarke]

I suspect the 120Kb footprint of the background image is of more concern to most visitors.   ---- Edward Clarke ECommerce and Software Consultant   TN38 Consulting http://blog.tn38.net   Creative Media Centre 17-19 Robertson Street Hastings East Sussex TN34 1HL United Kingdom From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Vanderhorst Sent: 24 July 2005 17:52 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf   The design is very nice but the background image of the tree repeats.  It is not noticeable until the resolution goes beyond 1024x768.  There were some css validation errors as well (http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile="">).