Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good
reason for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
1. Over 90% percent of the world population do not live there and do
not have dial-up access or other types of network access of such
quality.
In Romania where I am living dial-up access it's ... frustrating. So
it's cable sometimes, ADSL if way too expensive and other means of
network access are are inaccessible due to cost or limited area of
availability. What about laptops ? Or wireless access? Both are much
slower but in wide spread use. Did you know in my country you are
charged by the megabyte ? Technology is NOT spread uniformly all over
the world, and making your page smaller it's a better, smarter and fair
approach than waiting for the world to "catch up" with you guys. I'm
surprised you don't care but that's another story.
2.Is technology evenly spread in your countries ( US and Australia)? Is
there no place in those countries where Internet access makes you wanna
kill that evil designer that put a 4 Mb flash intro on your favourite
site ? I bet you all live in big cities, don't you ? Lucky guys ..
3. Australia and U.S are two countries where "going big" with your
pages will cost you more, as in bandwidth cost (etc), and in the end
will lead to loosing clients. Isn't it ?
Do you know what's the easy way to achieve a pixel perfect design on any browser ? Yes, tables ! Or is it not ?
We here, all know that's not really true and we stand for
it. And for usability and ACCESSIBILITY. And accessibility means
access for everyone regardless of technology availability or other
kinds of disabilities.
I think web standards were meant to raise awareness first and give an
impulse to all of us to build a better web. A web for everyone,
everywhere !
Otherwise we will end up with a web full of 10 Mb pages with embedded
databases, wallpaper backgrounds, tag soup and proprietary technologies
... oh, wait ... we already have that! Damn ...
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Mugur Padurean
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Donna Jones
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Hope Stewart
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Mugur Padurean
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Mugur Padurean
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Hope Stewart
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Mugur Padurean
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Donna Jones
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf leenath1
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf dszady
- Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf Donna Jones