John,

> I've been waiting for one of the Australian members of the mailing  
> list to comment on the new look/code for http://abc.net.au/ so I  
> might as well raise the issue myself.
>
> I personally had nothing to do with the design, code or any other  
> aspect of it (apart from being involved in a very broad  
> consultative process), but I'd be interested in a WSG perspective.


yeah, we have been picking this one apart for a few weeks over here at
news.com.au! Looks good all up. I like the initial design and it seems to
break down really well with styles off so some good thought has gone into
the layout and coding which is good to see.

Noticed you are using relative font sizing which is something we are trying
to push here so good to see it working well on such an information heavy
site.

One thing I notice is the lack of consistency of the 'cover' page from any
page you get to through a link. It seems to me this may be beyond your
control as they seem to be a bunch of different mini-sites, but would have
been great to carry that look and feel throughout the whole site to maintain
consistency.

This also carries with the 800_html version. It is a useful feature, but
again only really sticks with the first page and then does not carry over to
the other pages.

nice work!

scott gledhill
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to