After a quick view I've got to say I think it's pretty good... bit of
sniffing on the front page for resolution... skip links... alternative
formats... good meta.
Visually, it's a solid, clear three (or four) column display.
I'm not a fan of portal type sites as they tend to be link heavy and
lacking in informative pathways (i.e what am I'm supposed to do to get
what I want, and is it here?) but generally the link labels here are
pretty good.
Shame the graphic about the redesign has no alt content.... but over
all job well done.
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
On 4 Aug 2005, at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been waiting for one of the Australian members of the mailing
list to comment on the new look/code for http://abc.net.au/ so I might
as well raise the issue myself.
I personally had nothing to do with the design, code or any other
aspect of it (apart from being involved in a very broad consultative
process), but I'd be interested in a WSG perspective.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
