Dears,

 

In an attempt to bring a little contribution to the world of web standards we have developed a dozen templates that we would like to submit for your review. These templates are all shared under the terms of the "Attribution" license of "Creative Commons". We would like to obtain your comments in the following areas:

 

1) XHTML 1.1: quality of code (+ possible improvements)

2) CSS: quality of code (+ possible improvements)

3) WCAG: we tend to create Triple-A templates, how good are we doing? are our templates/pages really accessible?

4) Elegance of design: how good are we doing?

 

 

 

 

Here are the templates:

 

  1. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Liquid/Samples/tennis.html
  2. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/corporate/corporate2.html
  3. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/motoconcho/motoconcho.html
  4. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Liquid/Liquid2.html
  5. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Quietude/Quietude.html
  6. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/senator/senator.html
  7. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/spagyrum/spagyrum.html
  8. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Typografia/Typografia.html
  9. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Veritas/Veritas.html
  10. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/NewYork/NewYork.html
  11. http://www.fastwrite.com/dvlonly/web/paradeigma/Furio/Furio.html

 

Thank you for your input.

 

 

 

Pat Boens

Reply via email to