Joe Clarke did a speech on it earlier this year at @media... his
slides can be found at http://joeclark.org/atmedia/atmedia-NOTES-2.html
On 5 Oct 2005, at 16:53, Mike Brown wrote:
Hey
I don't think there is, but is there any sort of consensus of the
use of
"zoom" layouts?
<http://www.alistapart.com/articles/lowvision/>
<http://www.joeclark.org/atmedia/atmedia-NOTES-2.html>
<http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2005/06/24/zoom-layout.html>
In particular:
1) How do you signal that one is available? I'd like to use text (as
opposed to an icon) but who is going to know what "zoom layout" means?
Perhaps "low-vision layout" or "low-vision version" work better?
2) How it looks. Do you have light type on dark background or dark
type on
light background?
I suspect that these just haven't been used enough for any good
practice
to have developed, but any thoughts would be of interest.
Thanks!
Mike
SIGNIFY LTD :: the logic behind
===================================
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
