Christian Montoya wrote:
doesn't work! You are all viewing text/html. Pretty soon everyone on
this list will think they are serving xhtml.
Yes, and a large percentage of them will serve complete garbage :-)
I'll get it started right:
DID NOT work in every single browser. Version 0.1 to 1000.
IE/Mac/Linux/Sun.
Sound better - and is probably 100% true.
Since my approach to xhtml seems to be ever so slightly misunderstood by
some, may I be allowed to link to an extended version of that approach.
It seems to have worked reasonably well for me for the last couple of
years. However, I wouldn't mind if someone proved me wrong on this, as
there's always something to be learned on the subject of 'MIME type
jumping'.
It can be viewed as HTML4.01-equivalent XHTML1.0:
<http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.html>
(will even work in IE/win - on a good day.)
...or as xhtml1.0 served and hopefully received as 'application/xhtml+xml':
<http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml>
(this is what that page started out as. Need xml compliant browser, or
one that can "cheat" so it appears to parse the code correctly.)
...or as *complete garbage*:
<http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03-notvalid.xhtml>
(shouldn't work anywhere - despite the fact that it has only _one_
un-encoded ampersand.)
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
