Al Sparber wrote: > While it's usually best if you can lay out a page without tables, > tables and CSS are not mutualy exclusive. Tables are not the opposite > of CSS :-). This scenario also separates presentation from structure: > > markup: > > <table><tr> > <td id="content"> > Main content > </td> > > <td id="sidebar"> > Sidebar > </td> > </tr><table>
> Of course, it's just as easy to use DIVs and sometimes even to use > nothing :-) I see your point and I think it is valid re: presentation/sctructure, but IMHO CSS Driven means that CSS is used to "manipulate" the layout. #content and #sidebar could look like 2 sidebars, or a footer and header. http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/liquid.asp </plug> I also like Christian's simple definition: "Because when you turn CSS off, there's no styling, other than the browser defaults." Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
