Michael Wilson wrote: > I agree, but still it's interesting. I was surprised to see (in the data > Brian posted) so few users at a 1280 x 960 setting. We have a large > percentage who use this (I suppose because it is a 3:4 resolution).
Many graphics adapter drivers substitute the non-standard 5/4 bastard standard 1280x1024 for the standard 4/3 non-standard 1280x960. I have several doze configs around here that can do neither 1280x960 nor 1400x1050, but can do 1152x864 and 1600x1200 or more. -- Jesus Christ is the reason for the season. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
