It's a God-send. If only it had been properly explained sooner.

Fortunately my recent conversion to virtually tableless websites means I
do't have many changes to make. :)

--
Paul A Noone
Webmaster, ASHM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vlad Alexander (XStandard)
Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2005 9:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Best Web Standards thing I learnt in 2005.

Hi Terrence,

> The summary attribute is best used to describe the structure of the 
> table, not to summarise it's content.

Thanks for sharing that with us. Can you please let me know the source of
this info? Anybody else have an opinion on this?

Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com


-------- Original Message --------
From: Terrence Wood
Date: 12/21/2005 4:22 PM
> The best web standards thing I learnt in 2005 is:
> 
> How to best use the summary attribute for screen reader users:
> 
> The summary attribute is best used to describe the structure of the 
> table, not to summarise it's content. A longer summary is better 
> according to actual screen reader user testing.
> 
> How do you know if your summary works, if you don't have any screen 
> reader users to test with?
> 
> You need two people, someone to read the summary and someone to draw 
> the table. Read your summary aloud and see what the other person 
> draws. If the result resembles your table then you are on the right 
> track =)
> 
> Example from complex financial table:
> summary="There are 8 columns. Column 1 names the appropriation and 
> labels the row or rowgroup. Columns 2 through 5 report the numbers for 
> 2004/5, where column 2 is Budgeted Annual, column 3 is Budgeted Other, 
> column 4 is Estimated Actual Annual, column 5 is Estimated Actual 
> Other. Columns 6 through 7 report the numbers for 2005/6 where column 
> 6 is Vote Annual, column 7 is Vote Other. Column 8 contains narrative 
> on the scope of the appropriation. Rows are grouped by appropriation
type."
> 
> (yep.. "rowgroup" is jargon, but most people got it... you could say 
> "group of rows")
> 
> HTH, please share your discovery in 2005.
> 
> kind regards
> Terrence Wood.
> 
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
> 
> 


******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to