<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />

Is the correct layout that should be used to validate your template
(index.php) file 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of designer
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2006 1:34 AM
To: webstandards group
Subject: [WSG] content type etc

Hi All,

More questions as I battle to understand stuff about headers and xhtml . . .

My question is about the two alternative meta headers:

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> or
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml;
charset=utf-8" />

Someone (pretty sure it was Lachlan) said that the "content="text/html;" 
(or indeed content="application/xhtml+xml;)  bit was a waste of time and
didn't do anything.  So am I best changing it to simply:

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"  content="charset=utf-8" />


I would then end up with :

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN'    
'http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd'>
<html xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' xml:lang='en'> <head>
<title>Tester</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="charset=utf-8" /> <head>

etc.

Is that 'sensible'?  Is it 'correct'?

Sorry if this is dumb.

--
Best Regards,

Bob McClelland

Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk


******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to