On 3/4/07, Lea de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You should be approaching your client and explaining that you have some problems with the markup thats been supplied to you and its going to take longer than you anticipated, because you had assumed that the other contractor would be supplying professional work.
Hey Mike - it's annoying when things like this happen. I've had similar things happen in the past and I usually tell the client that the other company's work is sub-standard, but also say that they should take it back to the other company and ask for a new version that is: a) W3C standards-compliant b) bandwidth-efficient c) in line with current best practices This does two things: it tells the client you're not just bad-mouthing the other company to try and get the work yourself, and also spreads the word to the other company that it's time to stop partying like it's 1999. Whatever you decide to do, you should definitely NOT be recoding their work without being paid for it. -- Kay Smoljak business: www.cleverstarfish.com standards: kay.zombiecoder.com coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com personal: goatlady.wordpress.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
