thanks for your explanation.

dwain

On 3/7/07, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> i don't think you are missing anything.  imo what you are proposing

Actually I think I was missing something, because in my opinion, this was
a
no brainer and I didn't expect these answers at all.
For me if it fits in a two column table then it's not tabular data. I have
a
need for a table when it is the only tool that would make sense of the
data.
Usually that's the way I think about it, if it makes sense only in a table
then it's tabular data. I don't think the other way around, I don't leave
room for any other consideration. So in short, if it *also* makes sense in
a
DL or an UL or anything else (without styling), then it is not tabular
data.
Because only tables can display tabular data. I don't know if you see what
I
mean though, I may be making this more complicated than it is :)

> in your example is not tabular data at all.  it's content followed by
> a string of dots ending in more content.  if you are critized for
> thinking this is tabular data, then you should be critized; but, if
> you are being critized for wanting to pursue this type of
> presentation outside of a table, then i too am critized.

Yes I was criticized for suggesting that a Definition List was may be more
appropriate. I'm *really* surprised that so many people on *this* list
replied saying that using a table in this case would be ok. Because in my
opinion it's not. I'm not saying that people should not use a table for
this, I'm just saying that I don't think it is the "proper" solution in
this
particular case. And I do think there is a definitive answer :-)

Anyway, this was my examples using a Definition List
http://www.tjkdesign.com/lab/dot_dl/
http://www.tjkdesign.com/lab/dot_dl/with_no_image.asp

Thanks to all who responded

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************




--
dwain alford
p.o. box 145
winfield, alabama  35594
u.s.a.

tele:  205.487.2570
cell:  205.495.5619


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to