Thanks for all your comments, CSS3 sounds loads better, but it will probably be many years until we can get decent browser support!
I decided to put it in as an image, because I can't hide the text of an ordered list (list-style:none;) without it causing problems with Screen readers anyway. Hence if I used a background image to replace it, I defeat it's intended purpose. So, with that done, I can also use server side code to implement the image names. A bit easier all round, but the HTML doesn't look as clean as I would like. Thanks for your help everyone. Paul On 18/05/07, Mordechai Peller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lucien Stals wrote: > Why aren't you just dealing with this server side and generating the > desired classes and tags there? I see two reasons. First, by generating the CSS dynamically, browsers are unable to cache it, thereby loosing one of the benefits of external style sheets. Second, by adding all those extra classes (or ids), the HTML becomes bloated and looses semantic value. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
-- ----------------------------------------------- Paul Collins Ph: +44 (0) 793 9038 249 (UK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
