On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Kane Tapping wrote:
I have been reading with interest the WCAG Samurai Errata ( http://
wcagsamurai.org/errata/intro.html ) and am suprised to have not
found it discussed on WSG as of yet.
Hi, I finally got a chance to read the WCAG Samurai Errata. Maybe
something to do with my understanding in English, I see there is
autority tone in there. Overall impression is it's a good thing, it
seems the standard is higher (maybe it was because I am always so
confused with the WCAG ambiguous used of language thus never able to
fully understand) in claiming an accessible site.
Curious, is there an entity to issue certificate or safegaurd what
sites can really claim to be WCAG Samurai Errata compliance? Will the
validators be update to cater for Samurai Errata? Or just our
judegement with human eyes and best parctise be the call?
Lastly, I did not aware we can do this ? Did a brief reading in CSS 3
spec and I tried testing it in Safari, Firefox and Opera (thought
one of the browsers has already supported some of CSS3 elements) but
none of them work.
"
If images must be used for list bullets, do so only using CSS, as
with ul { list-style: url("arrow.gif") disc }"
tee
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
