Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On 30 Jun 2007, at 4:11 PM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Surely you don't mean that ;-)
On Sat, June 30, 2007 2:49 am, Chris Price wrote:
My thinking was that my real aim is to make the data useful so just
making it valid or logical may not be my prime concern.
Yes, I did a double-take at this myself. Logical is subjective - but
invalid is not useful. It's just a pain.
I didn't say I would be happy for it to be invalid but poor design that
validates isn't useful.
Kind Regards
--
Chris Price
Choctaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.choctaw.co.uk
Tel. 01524 825 245
Mob. 0777 451 4488
Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder
while Excellence is in the Hand of the Professional
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-+- Sent on behalf of Choctaw Media Ltd -+-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Choctaw Media Limited is a company
registered in England and Wales
with company number 04627649
Registered Office:
Lonsdale Partners,
Priory Close,
St Mary's Gate,
Lancaster LA1 1XB
United Kingdom
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
