Felix Miata wrote:
(Still falls foul of a minimum font-size set in the browser preferences,
though.)
I wouldn't say it "falls foul". If a user has set a minimum size, then a
page should heed that. It still *respects* minimum font-size settings.
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/Clagnut/eonsSS.html demonstrates the meaning of
"falls foul" in such cases.
Ah, a misunderstanding of terminology. I thought "minimum font-size
settings" referred to things like Firefox's preference setting for
disallowing fonts, even when resized by the user, to fall below a
certain fixed size...while in this case y'all seem to mean the default
font size.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
