On Wed, October 3, 2007 11:18 pm, Chris Wilson wrote: > I think my point is being missed entirely. I completely support standards > and accesability...
This is patently untrue. You have no concept of accessibility and the standards and why they exist. >Should target improve their site? > Yes. Should the be required to by a court? No. > It's not required by the court - it's required by law. The court is just administering the legislation which has been enacted by national government to help bring about a fully democratic society. > > Which idea of accessability should be imposed? Don't you even know this? See http://www.w3.org/WAI/ for a clue. (aside) Regardless of accessibility issues, target.com is very bad site and full of coding errors. I wouldn't advise anyone to carry out financial transactions through it. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
