Is it an "Idiotic error"?
Imagine you're blind...
And my blind tester says: "it's an idiotic error - must have been
implemented by non-blind people for the sole purpose of satisfying
non-blind people's imagination of what it's like to be blind".
My blind tester can't even read such a title attribute out of context
- it's attached to the link itself, as an addition to the link text.
Russ is focusing on the uniqueness of the link text itself, and you
already have that sorted out with a unique and relevant link text for
each link - if I understood you correctly.
The title attribute is irrelevant for identifying the link as unique,
and it is an additional _may be used_ anyway.
Not having title attributes wouldn't make links any more unique or
affect the link text in any way, but its absence would make it pass the
"unique" test. Check the logic in that.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
