That is correct people go into business to make money. They do so by
willing sellers selling to willing buyers and a price they willingly
agree to.
Why do people by certain products, because they decided that product
resolves their real world need.
The baker doesn't bake bread so you can eat, he bakes bread to make
money. You choose to buy the bread because you need to eat, and he
needs to make a bread you want eat so you will buy it from him. His
motivation though is money and there is nothing wrong with that.
Does anyone really believe government officials have a better ability to
run your business than you do?
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Gaspar wrote:
I just gonna say a few words...
I dont know and i dont care about laws, one thing iam sure if
microsoft could they just erase all other companys and all goes by
theres rules, i believe all companys do that.
The problem is that microsfot dont care about theirs users, dont care
if they could can use the software or not, they just want money money
money... and this is the problem
in legal ways we cant do nothing against, this is the Capitalism in full power.
sow lets fight, lets show all that they are and what they care about.
Congratz OPERA, u are there... iam gonna spam, iam gonna argue iam gonna blog...
u are not alone, for all hours that i lost, many, in try to get a nice
render in ie6, with alpha png and many many other things.
Thanks
On 14/12/2007, Michael Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't see why government should be enforcing standards. Shouldn't
that be a decision of private companies, developers and users not
government?
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Al Sparber wrote:
From: "Michael Horowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personally I'm looking forward to buying computers with virtually
nothing pre installed. I always end up deleting most of it anyway.
Alot of people start off by reinstalling the OS to get rid of all the
junk the PC manufacturers put on.
Indeed. But to bring it on-topic, I doubt very highly that Opera's
motivation is standards. If the unimaginable happened and MSIE8 were
as standards-comformant as Opera, it would also be stronger in the
marketplace. The best thing that could happen for standards-oriented
web developers would be that all computers shipped with a single,
extensible browser appliance with a standards-based module, managed
and updated by an independent party, being the chief extension. It's
better that the industry wake up now because eventually someone is
going to figure out that a browser is an appliance and the only thing
it should be doing is supporting standards and sitting unobtrusively
in the background acting as a window to the web.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
