Hi Andrew Dont worry im not considering those rare users :P
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:17 AM, James Jeffery wrote: > > could be the case when a user has JS enabled and not CSS > > > I'm having a hard time picturing the circumstances that would prompt a user > to choose this option - surely, if such a case does indeed exist, it must > rare as ... (pick your cliche). > > Maximising accessibility is a worthy goal, but surely there comes a point > where the benefit to one audience segment is outweighed by the harm to > another segment when a feature is disabled. If I were you I wouldn't let > your concern for this case hold you back from what looks to me like a very > elegant solution - one that I'm fairly sure I'm going to find myself > imitating sooner than later, so thanks in advance! > > Andrew > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
