> >> No, its not. In this case, if any single browser breaks a related > >> script, then the mark-up cannot be used - working on the majority is > >> not enough to make it viable. > > > > Does that mean we should drop the ABBR element because IE > > can't handle it properly? > > > > > In what way is that the same as the (ab)use in question?
Hi Mike, This is how I understood your posts in the context of this thread: Jason: "you cannot reference a <fieldset> through DOM unless it is inside a <form>" Hassan: "An easy theory to test, and hence, to prove utterly wrong" Mike: "I am doubtful that you managed to test every browser & version known to mankind before you replied - one or two combinations doesn't really make effective proof!" Hassan: "Au contraire, one is enough to prove the contention wrong" Mike: "No, its not. In this case, if any single browser breaks a related script, then the mark-up cannot be used" To me, it sounds like you're saying that if a script breaks in a browser because of how a particular element "behaves" in relation to the DOM, then that element should not be used. And this is why I mentioned "ABBR" since IE lt 7 creates "extra nodes" that makes most CSS and script fail. Did I misunderstand that last post? -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
