If W3C says so, I cannot see why at all. Who said a file extension should be 3 characters long? Microsoft!? Hah, don't make me laugh, just because they thought people wouldn't be able to have filenames longer than 8 characters and 3 characters for file extensions (known as the 8.3 system). People have later assumed that that is the norm. But file types like torrents (.torrent) have proven that it doesn't have to be the case.
In my opinion, I prefer .html over .htm, cause the technology is called HTML, not HTM, huh? Regards, Svip 2008/6/18 Rob Enslin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi peeps, > > I recently started noticing that our CMS system generated .htm pages where > previously the system produced .html pages. I questioned the support staff > and was told that the W3C deemed .html as non-standard file extensions (or > rather .htm were more-widely accepted as the standard) > > Is this true? Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > > Rob > > -- > Rob Enslin > Blog: http://enslin.co.uk > Twitter: http://twitter.com/robenslin > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
