On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob Enslin wrote: > >> I recently started noticing that our CMS system generated .htm pages where >> previously the system produced .html pages. I questioned the support staff >> and was told that the W3C deemed .html as non-standard file extensions (or >> rather .htm were more-widely accepted as the standard) > > Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Challenge the support staff to actually point out > where this statement from the W3C is supposed to be...
I'd have to agree; I'm inclined to believe that ".htm" is a carryover from when Microsoft(TM) products (ie DOS) only supported file extensions up to 3 characters in length. If there is a W3C statement, I'd love to see it. -- Scott Elcomb http://www.psema4.com/ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
