On 11 Aug 2008, at 16:47, David Dorward wrote:
On 11 Aug 2008, at 15:14, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
David Dorward wrote:
It doesn't really reject it, it just warns you that the
combination doesn't make much sense.
Sigh. Semantics. That was one suggested DOCTYPE that I found -- and
no, I'm not sure at this point where -- but regardless, do you know
the answer to the *original question*:
When will the W3C validator support ARIA?
As I said "Now".
Or, if you believe it already does, what is the appropriate DOCTYPE
to use?
Umm. What does the spec say?
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/ says:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+ARIA 1.0//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-aria-1.dtd
">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
xml:lang="en">
...
</html>
This is fine, but is XHML served as XML, so it wont work in IE, thus
the real world (unfortunately)
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
David Storey
Chief Web Opener,
Product Manager Opera Dragonfly,
Consumer Product Manager Opera Core,
Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group member
Consumer Product Management & Developer Relations
Opera Software ASA
Oslo, Norway
Mobile: +47 94 22 02 32
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://my.opera.com/dstorey
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
