I’m a front-end developer who works with a lot of .NET developers and one of
the things that bugs me about .NET sites is the amount of JavaScript Visual
Studio inserts under the main form tag:
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
var theForm = document.forms['aspnetForm'];
if (!theForm) {
theForm = document.aspnetForm;
}
function __doPostBack(eventTarget, eventArgument) {
if (!theForm.onsubmit || (theForm.onsubmit() != false)) {
theForm.__EVENTTARGET.value = eventTarget;
theForm.__EVENTARGUMENT.value = eventArgument;
theForm.submit();
}
}
//]]>
</script>
<script
src="/WebResource.axd?d=LvbDMffnZ-s6ymcTE4g6WQ2&t=633436949196615500"
type="text/javascript"></script>
<script
src="/ScriptResource.axd?d=wrIZKZL7_KbgLXTMiWfYzsQspz8GwtsPcBc7uCUpszNKKP3WbFFCl3AJvx6Kd7eASHIeYXhxjCQCV6UQDFAA4AA_gEP_X8qW1Mt8m1u_qEs1&t=633567193759204632"
type="text/javascript"></script>
<script
src="/ScriptResource.axd?d=wrIZKZL7_KbgLXTMiWfYzsQspz8GwtsPcBc7uCUpszNKKP3WbFFCl3AJvx6Kd7eAGO7iAY7Q9SHv9LWTfJoLMThoCq6lkmb-EEgQxgn3lN01&t=633567193759204632"
type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManager._initialize('ctl00$smMaster',
document.getElementById('aspnetForm'));
Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManager.getInstance()._updateControls([], [], [], 90);
//]]>
</script>
I’ve done some research and it looks like you can’t externalise this? And the
fact that a form tag gets wrapped around the entire html.
solutions for a digital world
----------------------------------------
Exchange Server 2007
Built-in Protection, Anywhere Access, Operational Efficiency
BLUEARC WILL HELP YOU MAKE THE MOVE. FIND OUT HOW
----------------------------------------
level 1, 11 albany street
st leonards nsw 2065
----------------------------------------
p: 02 9467 2500
d: 02 9467 25
f: 02 9431 5999
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.bluearcgroup.com
----------------------------------------
ARE YOU READY FOR NEXT GENERATION WEB TECHNOLOGY?
Leading the way in Web Content Management, IgnitionSuite Version 3.0 prepares
you for the future of the web.
To learn more call 9467 2500 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------
Privileged - Private & Confidential
This email and files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential or privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of this email or any attachment is prohibited. If you
receive this email and you are not the addressee, or you have received this
email in error, please disregard the contents of the email, delete the email
and notify the author immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blake
Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2008 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Robin Gorry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.mucu4u.org.nz/Home_61.aspx
> http://www.oneeast.co.nz/
> http://www.colorfastsigns.co.nz/Home_34.aspx
None of those sites validate.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************