On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:15:38 +1100, Anthony Ziebell wrote: > Oh, also... there is a requirement for our pages to validate (hence I can > only see > JavaScript as a valid option at this point?) >
*Is* there "a requirement for our pages to validate"? I would have thought that making a page more accessible would be far more important. After all, Google sees fit to ignore validation in order to speed up page rendering - another worthwhile goal. I must say that I regard validation and spell-checking as equivalent (and equally important). If I use my U.S. spell-checker on a review of a book with the word "colour" in the title, should I change the spelling according to the spell-check's version - "color"? I think not. Cordially, David -- ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
