> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I went through WCAG 1 and WCAG 2, and I expected an appropriate guideline to > show up under Priority 1 (or Level A), but nothing. Or am I missing > something in the obscure wording of the document that is WCAG? > > > > A user's choice of technology is not an accessibility issue. If people want to view content on the > web, they have to make sure they are using suitable hardware and software - using a 10-year-old > browser doesn't qualify, IMO. Should I be able to view a site on my Commodore 64? > >- Matthew
I agree that IE5 is probably not an issue, but suppose for a moment that Andreas had been talking about IE8, or more likely about IE6? Mike Mike Brockington Web Development Specialist www.calcResult.com www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk www.edinburgh.gov.uk This message does not reflect the opinions of any entity other than the author alone. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] *******************************************************************
