Judging by the lack of responses, I am probably not the only one who
didn't understand your question.
Particularly, you seem to be using the term 'image mapping' to mean
something other than using an image-map element, but I'm not aware of a
standard technique for this.
 
Regards,
Mike

________________________________

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 01 June 2009 15:35
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Image mapping standards question


It has recently come to my attention the struggles of an end-user when
viewing images for any user. I have seen sites such as Facebook,
MySpace, and other sites where pictures are hosted use roll-overs for
recognizing certain parts of an image. I realize that this can be done
using image maps as well as when using image mapping, I can add
alternative text not only to the img tag itself, but the maps as well to
show and describe certain features I feel are important. Are there
recommendations for or against this approach?

--
Brett P.

*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
******************************************************************* 


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to