Judging by the lack of responses, I am probably not the only one who didn't understand your question. Particularly, you seem to be using the term 'image mapping' to mean something other than using an image-map element, but I'm not aware of a standard technique for this. Regards, Mike
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett Patterson Sent: 01 June 2009 15:35 To: [email protected] Subject: [WSG] Image mapping standards question It has recently come to my attention the struggles of an end-user when viewing images for any user. I have seen sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and other sites where pictures are hosted use roll-overs for recognizing certain parts of an image. I realize that this can be done using image maps as well as when using image mapping, I can add alternative text not only to the img tag itself, but the maps as well to show and describe certain features I feel are important. Are there recommendations for or against this approach? -- Brett P. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] *******************************************************************
