> > Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an HTML 5 > video feed?
in a ie browser without any fudging? my initial response was only if Google are in position to take over Microsoft before that date, but... http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/05/19/another-follow-up-on-html5-video-in-ie9.aspx ie9: A New Hope? for the time being ie6 remains a significant number too me much as I wish it did'nt - S On 12 June 2010 12:42, Phil Archer <ph...@w3.org> wrote: > Again, interesting, stuff, Dave. > > Concerning your remark: > > > > If I was Microsoft I'd be quite worried that the IT support pros, > > influencers and developers have such a different make-up than the > > mainstream. > > I believe they are indeed concerned about this. AIUI they're a little fed > up with the constant remarks on fora like this where we're broadly able to > talk about "the standards browsers" and mean "every browser except IE for > which, everyone knows you need to put in workarounds." IE9 is going to take > a big step towards changing that with support for SVG, XHTML and more. > > As for when IT departments get around to changing over to it, who can say? > Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an HTML 5 > video feed? > > Phil. > > > > Dave Lane wrote: > >> For what it's worth, some of our non-techie sites (with much smaller >> user numbers, as they're focused on the relatively tiny New Zealand >> market) are showing a slightly rosier picture over the past month: >> >> Advocacy website for cyclists (4544 visits): >> IE: 41.57% (IE6-15.09% 7-37.96% 8-46.96%) >> FF: 40.29% >> CHROME: 9.09% >> SAFARI: 7.68% >> OPERA: 0.62% >> >> IE6 = 6.27% >> >> Sports clothing (28,337 visits): >> IE: 49.92% (IE6-13.8% 7-27.06% 8-59.11%) >> FF: 24.87% >> CHROME: 6.20% >> SAFARI: 17.82% >> OPERA: 0.77% >> >> IE6 = 6.88% >> >> Brewers website (3,300 visits): >> IE: 45.97% (IE6-10.42% 7-30.72% 8-58.87%) >> FF: 30.06% >> CHROME: 11.27% >> SAFARI: 10.03% >> OPERA: 1.03% >> >> IE6 = 4.79% >> >> Tourism operator (4,041 visits): >> IE: 54.84% (IE6-11.60% 7-28.07% 8-60.24%) >> FF: 26.73% >> CHROME: 4.80% >> SAFARI: 12.77% >> OPERA: 0.42% >> >> IE6 = 6.36% >> >> For contrast, here're the stats for a tech company. >> >> IT services and software dev company (3,050 visits): >> IE: 15.02% (IE6-8.52% 7-19.87% 8-71.62%) >> FF: 56.20% >> CHROME: 18.52% >> SAFARI: 5.48% >> OPERA: 2.82% >> >> IE6 = 1.28% >> >> If I was Microsoft I'd be quite worried that the IT support pros, >> influencers and developers have such a different make-up than the >> mainstream. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> On 12/06/10 00:32, Lea de Groot wrote: >> >>> On 11/06/10 9:32 PM, Foskett, Mike wrote: >>> >>>> I just took a peek at our own stats for May 2010. >>>> >>>> A very large set limited to UK online shoppers only. >>>> >>>> And I couldn't agree less with the article. >>>> >>> I have a couple of large .au 'mum and dad' sites (ie, not techie) and I >>> have similar results to your .uk figures: >>> >>> Internet Explorer 67.11% Firefox 17.19% Safari >>> 9.70% Chrome 4.67% >>> with specific IE figures of >>> IE8.0 59.08% IE7.0 28.46% IE6.0 12.44% >>> ie IE 6 is at 8.3% overall - lower than your numbers, but still worth >>> testing for. >>> >>> Interestingly, I have iphone/ipod numbers at 2.77% and rising fast - I >>> guess I better get those mobile versions up! >>> >>> Lea >>> >> >> > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Mobile Web Initiative > http://www.w3.org/Mobile > > http://philarcher.org > @philarcher1 > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
