Any bets we'll still be using HTML5 in 2018? On Sat, June 12, 2010 4:16 pm, Sam Sherlock wrote: >> >> Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an >> HTML 5 >> video feed? > > > in a ie browser without any fudging? > > my initial response was only if Google are in position to take over > Microsoft before that date, but... > > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/05/19/another-follow-up-on-html5-video-in-ie9.aspx > > ie9: A New Hope? > > for the time being ie6 remains a significant number too me much as I wish > it > did'nt > > - S > > > > > On 12 June 2010 12:42, Phil Archer <ph...@w3.org> wrote: > >> Again, interesting, stuff, Dave. >> >> Concerning your remark: >> >> >> > If I was Microsoft I'd be quite worried that the IT support pros, >> > influencers and developers have such a different make-up than the >> > mainstream. >> >> I believe they are indeed concerned about this. AIUI they're a little >> fed >> up with the constant remarks on fora like this where we're broadly able >> to >> talk about "the standards browsers" and mean "every browser except IE >> for >> which, everyone knows you need to put in workarounds." IE9 is going to >> take >> a big step towards changing that with support for SVG, XHTML and more. >> >> As for when IT departments get around to changing over to it, who can >> say? >> Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an >> HTML 5 >> video feed? >> >> Phil. >> >> >> >> Dave Lane wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, some of our non-techie sites (with much smaller >>> user numbers, as they're focused on the relatively tiny New Zealand >>> market) are showing a slightly rosier picture over the past month: >>> >>> Advocacy website for cyclists (4544 visits): >>> IE: 41.57% (IE6-15.09% 7-37.96% 8-46.96%) >>> FF: 40.29% >>> CHROME: 9.09% >>> SAFARI: 7.68% >>> OPERA: 0.62% >>> >>> IE6 = 6.27% >>> >>> Sports clothing (28,337 visits): >>> IE: 49.92% (IE6-13.8% 7-27.06% 8-59.11%) >>> FF: 24.87% >>> CHROME: 6.20% >>> SAFARI: 17.82% >>> OPERA: 0.77% >>> >>> IE6 = 6.88% >>> >>> Brewers website (3,300 visits): >>> IE: 45.97% (IE6-10.42% 7-30.72% 8-58.87%) >>> FF: 30.06% >>> CHROME: 11.27% >>> SAFARI: 10.03% >>> OPERA: 1.03% >>> >>> IE6 = 4.79% >>> >>> Tourism operator (4,041 visits): >>> IE: 54.84% (IE6-11.60% 7-28.07% 8-60.24%) >>> FF: 26.73% >>> CHROME: 4.80% >>> SAFARI: 12.77% >>> OPERA: 0.42% >>> >>> IE6 = 6.36% >>> >>> For contrast, here're the stats for a tech company. >>> >>> IT services and software dev company (3,050 visits): >>> IE: 15.02% (IE6-8.52% 7-19.87% 8-71.62%) >>> FF: 56.20% >>> CHROME: 18.52% >>> SAFARI: 5.48% >>> OPERA: 2.82% >>> >>> IE6 = 1.28% >>> >>> If I was Microsoft I'd be quite worried that the IT support pros, >>> influencers and developers have such a different make-up than the >>> mainstream. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> On 12/06/10 00:32, Lea de Groot wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/06/10 9:32 PM, Foskett, Mike wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just took a peek at our own stats for May 2010. >>>>> >>>>> A very large set limited to UK online shoppers only. >>>>> >>>>> And I couldn't agree less with the article. >>>>> >>>> I have a couple of large .au 'mum and dad' sites (ie, not techie) and >>>> I >>>> have similar results to your .uk figures: >>>> >>>> Internet Explorer 67.11% Firefox 17.19% Safari >>>> 9.70% Chrome 4.67% >>>> with specific IE figures of >>>> IE8.0 59.08% IE7.0 28.46% IE6.0 12.44% >>>> ie IE 6 is at 8.3% overall - lower than your numbers, but still worth >>>> testing for. >>>> >>>> Interestingly, I have iphone/ipod numbers at 2.77% and rising fast - I >>>> guess I better get those mobile versions up! >>>> >>>> Lea >>>> >>> >>> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C Mobile Web Initiative >> http://www.w3.org/Mobile >> >> http://philarcher.org >> @philarcher1 >> >> >> ******************************************************************* >> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org >> ******************************************************************* >> >> > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > *******************************************************************
******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
