Thanks Tim. I've been shadowing this list for quite some time and haven't made the time to start working with wsif. However, I'll be investigating its use quite soon.
I'd sure be interested in any details you or other folks have regarding implementations or other experience. As far as the bugs, at least we have access to the source :) As far as alternatives, I'm not aware of any. It has a lot of benefits and you'd think that many more folks would be interested in using it, but you can't tell from the activity on the list. Eric > Not exactly... > > One on my colleagues has taken a great interest in WSIF, but he has had to > use the latest build rather than the latest release because of a number of > bugs that exist in the latest release. Even then he needed to either fix > or implement a couple of things himself. > > I'll get some more details and post them. Ideally we don't want to use our > own hybrid version but there seemed to be little activity that was taking > WSIF forward. This made me think there was some alternative that we > weren't aware of. > > Tim. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aleksander Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:03 PM > Subject: Re: Status update > > > Tim Williams wrote: > > > What is the status of WSIF? > > > > it is pretty stable. > > > > > Has development stopped or are there plans for the future...? > > > > AFAIK there is no any release plan. > > > > are there any features that you are interested to see in WSIF? > > > > thanks, > > > > alek > > > > -- > > The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
