On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote: > Hi Bill and Joe, Hi John, > > 1) What version of Qt are you compiling against? Qt5.2.1? I compiled > a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to be able > to get full c++11 support. But qt-project now has 5.3.1 available. Have > you (or anyone) used this and should we incorporate 5.3.1 in the beta > version? Will it be necessary to compile from source again? I tried Qt 5.3.1 on Windows and everything compiled and linked OK. No changes required. I did hit a problem with building the install target on Windows with a Fortran secondary library not being pulled in by the fixup_bundle CMake script. For now I would suggest sticking with Qt 5.2.1 until I can get to the bottom of why that isn't working. > > 2) Your new hamlib is "imminent". I'll wait for this before testing a Mac > version on OSX 10.9.4. OK, I will keep the list updated with pushes to the public repo of my Hamlib-3 fork. > > --- John G4KLA > 73 Bill G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
