Hi all,
For the record: I have built a version of WSJT that calls sfrsd (with
ntrials=10000) rather than kvasd. Results in line 20, below, show that
for the test data the new decoder is slightly better than kvasd (line 10).
# Test Decodes False Time
------------------------------------------------------------
1. WSJT-X (BM only) 2
2. WSJT (BM only) 5
3. WSJT-X + kvasd 189
4. WSJT-X + kvasd (thresh0=1, ntest>0) 207
5. WSJT-X + sfrsd (Linux) 302
6. WSJT-X + sfrsd (Win32) 309
7. WSJT-X + sfrsd (Linux, thresh0=1) 348
8. WSJT-X + sfrsd (Win32, thresh0=1) 350
9. WSJT + kvasd (Linux) 809
10.WSJT + kvasd (Win32) 809
11.WSJT + sfrsd (10000) 464
12.WSJT + sfrsd (SFM no ntest 10000) 519
13.WSJT + sfrsd (SFM no ntest 20000) 543
14.WSJT + sfrsd (SFM no ntest 1000) 342
15.WSJT + sfrsd (SFM no ntest 100000) 706
16.WSJT + sfrsd (SFM no ntest 1000000) 786 (11 hours)
17.rsdtest (r5939, ntrials=10000) 809 + 2 false (4.6 min)
18.rsdtest (r5939, ntrials=100000) 876 + 6 false (29 min)
19.rsdtest (r5939, ntrials=1000000) 902 + 9 false (220 min)
20.WSJT + sfrsd2 (10000) 837 + 0 false
I will try building it into WSJT-X next.
-- Joe, K1JT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
