Joe - Just a quick note - I played a bit over lunch and can verify that things tune right up if the erasure matrix is matched to the metric. So far, no apparent advantage for the p1/psum form, but I haven’t tried the mr2 probabilities yet. Will look at it some more tonight. Steve k9an
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I'm scratching my head... > > At SVN revision r5949, WSJT-X v1.6.1 uses sfrsd2 in place of kvasd. It > seems to work well, but so far the only tuning I've done is to try both > the original (kvasd-inspired) metrics and the simple ones based on > p1/psum and p2/psum. In this instance the simple metrics produce > significantly MORE decodes that the exp() ones. > > Earlier today, I thought I had established the opposite to be true when > using rsdtest -- and also when using WSJT. > > For the moment, then, I'm scratching my head. ??? > > Anyway, I plan to go ahead and try sdrsd2 (in WSJT-X) on some real > 20-meter data. > > -- Joe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
