Hi Bill,
OK, understood.
As far as I'm aware, all parameters are being passed correctly at
present. The method is kludgey, to be sure. No doubt better ways exist.
On a related matter: have you given up your effort aimed at compiling
the decoders into wsjt-x, as opposed to a separate jt9 process? You may
have noticed that the "fast" modes -- JTMSK, ISCAT, and Fast JT9 -- are
decoded in WSJT-X itself, with a separate thread started with a
QtConcurrent::run() call. My hangup in bringing the jt9[.exe] stuff
into WSJT-X has been that it would need a way to send decoding results,
as obtained, back to the GUI thread. I haven't spent the time to work
out how to (in effect) send Qt "signals" from the Fortran code.
-- Joe
On 12/17/2015 9:29 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 14:25, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Not sure what you meant by "the passing of experience based parameter
>> from wsjtx is not right". Could you clarify?
> Hi Joe,
>
> I thought the size of the parameter block copied in jt9c.f90 was wrong,
> maybe not. But I am changing it so the compiler works out the size so
> all you need to do is amend the C and Fortran structures if you want to
> change the number or size of variables.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
