On 04/05/2016 05:59 PM, George J Molnar wrote: > Yep, Mike, am familiar with the standard. Was proposing a change to it > that doesn’t disrupt the cadence. As you can see, it keeps the CQ’er on > his even/odd cycle and provides a valid QSO also. Just shorter. The > final 73 is a courtesy, and usually works out as an invitation for the > next caller.
Hi George and all, Please consider that if a message has been received and if it cannot be decoded without errors, I have to resend my previous message. With the standard sequence, it's ensured that the QSO will always be completed, even if some messages have to be resent. With the proposed shorted sequence, this is not assured in any case. Best 88 de Claude ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
