Couple other things to remember... Now that the dev version of WSJT-X can decode overlapping signals it's possible you may see message from non-partners. So knowing whose message it is more important than ever. I've see quite a few overlapping QSOs. Also...remember the FCC requires you ID yourself at end of communication.
RRR Mike W9MDB On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Claude Frantz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/05/2016 05:59 PM, George J Molnar wrote: > >> Yep, Mike, am familiar with the standard. Was proposing a change to it >> that doesn’t disrupt the cadence. As you can see, it keeps the CQ’er on >> his even/odd cycle and provides a valid QSO also. Just shorter. The >> final 73 is a courtesy, and usually works out as an invitation for the >> next caller. > > Hi George and all, > > Please consider that if a message has been received and if it cannot be > decoded without errors, I have to resend my previous message. With the > standard sequence, it's ensured that the QSO will always be completed, > even if some messages have to be resent. With the proposed shorted > sequence, this is not assured in any case. > > Best 88 de Claude > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
