On 22/04/2017 00:21, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
Saw this posted on the JTDX Yahoo group.
"JTDX outperforms WSJT-X, especially with overlapping signals. Also,
JTDX is more sensitive"
Hi Laurie,
that may well be true but only at the cost of more false decodes, using
more CPU resources than users with low spec machines might have or by
applying a customized message analyser to filter out possible false
decodes that potentially hides some valid decodes. Also there's nothing
there for Mac users, EME users, VHF, UHF or Microwave users either.
Bottom line is that there would be no JTDX without WSJT-X. Same applies
to JT65-HF, that would not be there if there had not been WSJT to steal
functionality from.
There is no such thing as a free lunch.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
