Bill,
Fair points, I did not do the calculation. 
I have tried the remote audio route with a raspberry - will try the VNC so see 
how far i get.

Thanks.

JC
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 01/06/2017 20:10, Jc Martin wrote:
>> Actually, I have been looking at this option too.
>> The use case is a remote rig usage where audio transport over the internet 
>> makes WSJT sad (or more exactly, JT65/9 is not happy with jitter).
>> An alternative is remote display - but there the only benefit would be to 
>> see the waterfall, and the desktop streaming itself is bandwidth hungry.
> 
> Hi JC,
> 
> using a decent VNC server and client should minimize remote desktop bandwidth 
> and not showing the waterfall or making it as small and as slow as is 
> reasonable will reduce the network bandwidth of screen updates considerably.
> 
> I would contest that the required bandwidth for remote desktop control is 
> less than that required for low latency audio at 16-bit 48000Hz. Added to 
> that the latency requirements for the remote desktop are far less demanding.
> 
> If you are able to have a computer running WSJT(-X) at the receiver site then 
> you will have far less problems. It need be no more than a recent Raspberry 
> Pi model for most modes (MSK144 is not going to be possible with small SoC 
> systems).
> 
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to