On 26/07/2017 17:26, Bill Somerville wrote:
AP decoding places more diligence on the operator as such decodes can be deceptively valid and you should look at the quality and other decoder information added after the message before making an assessment on the accuracy of the decode.
I should also add that the '?' low confidence marker should only occur on a minority of AP decodes and even then the decode is more likely to be valid than false. It is just than letting a few false decodes through with a warning is much more productive overall than setting the pass criteria so high that far fewer good decodes get through.
73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
