Pino,
since WSJT-X uses a logging file, rather than a transaction safe
database server, the certain way of doing what you want to do is to keep
the two direct logs from WSJT-X separate, and then subsequently to use
those files as input to a separate logging program. Otherwise there is
the risk of losing a logging entry if both instances attempt to open a
joint file at around the same time, and only one is able to do so.
[Since you are running 2 instances simultaneously, presumably there are
2 or more CPU threads active at once.]
It rather depends on what happens in WSJT-X if a log file can not be
opened. Please forgive me for not reading the source!
HTH, 73,
Robin, G8DQX
On 20/08/17 03:28, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I think as long as you're logging only one at a time you should be OK
since the logging files are opened and closed pretty quickly.
It's the ALL.TXT file that could be a problem during decoding as that
can all happen at the same time so I'd keep that separate.
You are referring to the ADIF file?
de Mike W9MDB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Pino Zollo <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:28 PM
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] Two instances
I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different radios...
on Linux
....is it possible to have a single, unic, logging file ?
can I do symbolic links without messing up the log data ?
TU 73
Pino ZP4KFX
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
