Reviewing PSKReporter Statistics page "Modes over the last 2 hours"
https://www.pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/pskstats.pl
shows only 339 JT9 decodes.
Perhaps the 77-80 segment could be a shared segment with DXp experiments?

Bill
W2PKY

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:03 PM, rjai...@gmail.com <rjai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I do agree that care needs to be taken. Already there are loud
> complaints about PSK31 windows being pushed out by other modes. We
> don't want to exacerbate this more.
>
> However I think the onus is more on the dxpedition operator rather
> than WSJT-X developers. There are frequencies higher up or lower down
> in the window seldom used, where 3kHz can be found.
>
> Like all modes in the end the operator is responsible.
>
> 73
> Ria, N2RJ
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Erik Icket <runninge...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > What about this suggestion so that FT8 and FT8 Dxpedition do not step on
> > each other's frequencies and modes are not mixed up in the allocated
> > segments ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Introduce a new "Mode" in the menu "FT8 DXexp"
> > By default (after a software installation or frequency reset) the "FT8
> > DXexp" frequency list is empty
> >
> >
> >
> > The behaviour of the GUI could be such that :
> >
> >
> >
> > If either fox or hound sets up a frequency for DXExp mode, frequencies
> > reserved for other modes cannot be entered.
> > If FT8 mode is selected from the menu, only frequencies for FT8 mode can
> be
> > selected
> > If "FT8 Dxexp" mode is selected from the menu, only frequencies for "FT8
> > Dxexp" mode can be selected (if these were entered previously)
> >
> >
> >
> > This suggestion is not foolproof (one can still tweak it such that modes
> > overlap, for whatever intentions) but could maybe serve as a start for
> > exchanging some ideas on how to handle this.
> >
> >
> >
> > With all my respect for bringing FT8 to the ham community,
> >
> >
> >
> > Erik,
> >
> > ON4PB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to