On 05/14/2018 11:32 AM, Wolfgang wrote: Hi Wolfgang & All,
>> CQ OT/70AST JO10 >> CQ DM/65MVP JO63 > >> My conclusion is that these are pirated callsigns. > > No, they are not. Unfortunately all kind of special event callsigns poping > up in recent times. They use the slash to fool WSJT-X and the message > becomes a classification of a 'Type 2 pfx' and AutoSeq will work at the > QSO partner. Using 'OT70AST' will be 'free text' and truncate the message. > The legal aspect is a different issue ;-) I share this last opinion. We cannot consider the forging of callsigns as a solution. The legal framework does not allow this. We need other solutions which are compatible with the legal framework. On some occasions, I have seen exceptionally long callsigns like "GB2012OSPAR". I understand very well that they cannot be handled easily in the current context of WSJT-X. Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
