Hi Mike,
we are not hear to determine how operators at a DXpedition site choose
to operate, we are not aware of conditions on the ground. If they feel
that they are getting optimum rates without calling CQ then that is
their choice. Remember that calling CQ from a rare entity can result in
a passband 100% full of pile up, they may have tried it and decided it
doesn't help the QSO rate.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 30/06/2018 17:05, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
But what about them receiving all these calls in the blind? Isn't
that going to interfere when they try to respond to people who can't
hear them?
Mike
On Saturday, June 30, 2018, 11:04:11 AM CDT, Bill Somerville
<g4...@classdesign.com> wrote:
On 30/06/2018 16:57, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
OK...so it appears the CQ every 5 trasnmissions is NOT enforced
unless Fox clicks the "More CQs" box.
We'd be a lot better off if this was always forced and Hounds were
restricted to only answer CQ's.
This explains why we don't see the CQ's and calling blind is normally
necessary (as long as you can see KH7Z that is).
if(m_tFoxTxSinceCQ>=m_foxCQtimeandui->cbMoreCQs->isChecked()){
de Mike W9MDB
Hi Mike,
it should be reasonable to assume that if the Baker Is. operators are
not enforcing regular CQ calls then they have plenty of callers to
keep the to-be-worked queue populated with more stations than Tx slots
and a QSO rate that is high.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
