Hi Tom,
Pretty daft to kill processes that may be needed on an assumption.
It's not daft, at all. Probably 99% of WSJT-X users run only one
instance. In the rare but not unheard-of case where something caused a
program crash, jt9.exe may be left running. When WSJT-X is re-started,
that zombie jt9.exe must be killed.
Surely it's easy enough for you to start your instances in the proper
order? The ~1% of users running multiple instances have been doing that
for years, with no issues.
-- Joe, K1JT
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
