Asked around on ON4KST and no-one has any strong view 

Lot of stations setting up skeds on 70.154 so would say unless there is a dev 
issue then for FT8 Region 1 it would be beneficial to set default in table to 
70.154


73’s

Tom
GM8MJV (IO85)





On 30 Jan 2019, at 16:21, Tom Melvin <t...@tkrh.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks for looking Bill
> 
> OK on SA bandplan - looking at 4m allocations - I _doubt_ will get a freq 
> that suits all.
> 
> Lets see if there is any feedback from other 4m users.
> 
> 
> 
> 73’s
> 
> Tom
> GM8MJV (IO85)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 30 Jan 2019, at 13:12, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 30/01/2019 12:53, Tom Melvin wrote:
>>> All
>>> 
>>> Region 1 - UK 
>>> 
>>> While in the freq area - 70 Mhz - it’s set as 70.100  for FT8
>>> 
>>> However as this is not in the German allocation 99.9% of the FT8 4m 
>>> activity is centred around 70.154. Also 70.100 is right on the boundary of 
>>> the RSGB band Plan for ‘Personal Beacons’.
>>> 
>>> I see MSHV (which is popular over here due to the extra modes and is aimed 
>>> more at 50Mhz and above) has 4m FT8 preset at 70.154. Googling 70.100 and 
>>> 70.154 all the web pages  refer to 70.154 as FT8 freq - yes the odd proviso 
>>> that varying countries have different allocations so may never have one 
>>> freq that fits all on 70.
>>> 
>>> I would seem (IMHO) to have all the FT8 supported packages to have the same 
>>> frequency to save confusion once the Es session starts up.
>>> 
>>> Yes I know any one can edit the frequency table but half the users don’t 
>>> seem to know what the ‘Settings’ option actually does and where it is.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 73’s
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> GM8MJV (IO85)
>> Tom,
>> 
>> I consulted with some regular users of WSJT modes on 4m and was promised 
>> that they would get back to me with a best option for a 4m working frequency 
>> in IARU Region 1. They did not get back to me and I am still waiting. If 
>> 70.154 is the de facto working frequency in Region 1 then I will happily 
>> change the default in WSJT-X.
>> 
>> One thing that should be considered is compatibility with the South African 
>> band plan which appears to have 70.150 - 70.200 allocated to digital FM 
>> modes that would not interact well with FT8.
>> 
>> Comments from regular 4m digi-mode operators welcome.
>> 
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to