Hi: The Dev Team raise again the level. Given FT8 success, FT4 Could be another killer mode. I hope so. Now some questions, When the Dev Team expects the mode will be available for loading QSO with it. Yes I know it is premature but... have to ask. Until that QSO are advised to upload as "DATA", or How?
Thank you for improving what was already a standard. Wonder I was thinking about WSJTX 2.1 dev and you guys launch that amazing announcement. Hope everything works as intended.! 73' Edfel KP4AJ On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 6:54 PM Bill Frantz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/22/19 at 1:41 PM, [email protected] (Adam Bartlett) wrote: > > >I could also see some non-contest uses for it - think SOTA/WWFF/POTA type > >'activations' which are not WARC band restricted but where an operator may > >wish to use a higher throughput rate for QSOs. While primarily a contest > >tool, FT4 could serve as a mechanism for operators who operate non-contest > >award programs where there is some value in operating faster QSOs than FT8 > >or other low signal modes allow for. > > It might also be possible that many will migrate to FT4 because > QSOs are faster than with FT8. I have one JT9 QSO in my log, but > decided it was too much like watching paint dry. FT4 will appeal > to adrenaline junkies (a description which sometimes includes me). > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | Re: Hardware Management Modes: | Periwinkle > (408)356-8506 | If there's a mode, there's a | 16345 > Englewood Ave > www.pwpconsult.com | failure mode. - Jerry Leichter | Los Gatos, > CA 95032 > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
