A quick two cents… Is there a good reason why FT4 could not use the existing JT65 and JT9 watering holes on all bands? They are quite clear most of the time, and considerate operators could certainly share, especially with JT9.
In areas where licenses don’t allow operation on the watering holes, it seems that we have (mostly) figured it out around the world. Looking forward to testing out the new mode. Wonder if speed will trump sensitivity for general use? Many thanks to the dev team for years of effort for the ham community. George J Molnar KF2T, Arlington, Virginia, USA Please note my new email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
